2024年12月07日雅思大作文范文:是否应该禁止非必要的航班

2024年12月07日雅思写作考试已经结束，小编搜集整理了本次雅思写作task2范文：是否应该禁止非必要的航班，供雅思考生参考。

　　WRITING TASK 2　　

　　Long-distance flight consumes the amount of fuel that a car uses in many years and pollutes the air. Some people think non-essential flights should be banned rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　建议思路： I tend to agree

　　让步：

　　不可否认，长途飞行确实消耗大量燃料且严重污染(seriously pollute)空气。例如，一趟跨洲际(intercontinental)的航班所排放的温室气体量巨大，相当于一辆汽车多年的排放量。然而，禁止(ban)非必要的长途飞行并非是解决问题的最优方案(optimal solution)。因为在一些紧急(emergency)情况下，如医疗救援(medical rescue)、国际商务合作等，长途飞行是不可或缺(indispensable)的。而且，现代社会中很多人的工作和生活需要频繁(frequently)地在不同地区之间穿梭(shuttle)，完全禁止长途飞行会对这些人的正常生活和工作造成极大不便(great inconvenience)，甚至影响全球经济的运转。

　　支持段：

　　我们也不能忽视汽车使用对环境造成的污染。

　　1. 虽然单次长途飞行的污染量较大，但汽车的数量众多(numerous)，其总体排放量也是相当可观(considerable)的。以大城市为例，每天道路上拥堵(congested)的车辆排放出大量的尾气，加重(aggravate)了空气污染。

　　2. 此外，汽车的能源消耗也在不断增长，对石油等不可再生资源造成了巨大压力(huge pressure)。而且，随着科技的进步，汽车行业在节能减排方面也取得了一定的成果(achieve certain achievements)，比如电动汽车的逐渐普及(gradual popularization)，这使得限制(limit)汽车使用而非禁止长途飞行成为一个更具可持续性(sustainability)和灵活性(flexibility)的选择。

　　In conclusion, 虽然长途飞行对环境的破坏不容忽视，但完全禁止非必要的长途飞行并非明智之举(wise move)。我们应该综合考虑(comprehensively consider)各种交通方式对环境的影响，采取更加平衡和全面(comprehensive)的措施，如推广(promote)清洁能源、提高燃油效率标准(improve fuel efficiency standards)、加强公共交通建设等，以实现环境保护和社会发展的双赢(win-win)。

　　Some argue that long-distance flights should be banned due to their significant fuel consumption and air pollution, instead of restricting car usage. I tend to agree with this perspective, as limiting flights rather than cars could help mitigate environmental damage. However, a complete ban on non-essential flights may not be the optimal solution.

　　It is undeniable that long-distance flights consume a tremendous amount of fuel and seriously pollute the air. For instance, an intercontinental flight emits a massive quantity of greenhouse gases, equivalent to a car’s emissions over many years. However, banning non-essential long-distance flights entirely is not a practical measure. In some emergency situations, such as medical rescues or critical international business collaborations, flights are indispensable. Furthermore, in modern society, many individuals need to frequently shuttle between regions for work or personal reasons. Completely banning long-distance flights would cause great inconvenience to their daily lives and even disrupt global economic operations.

　　At the same time, we cannot ignore the environmental damage caused by the numerous cars on the roads. Although a single long-distance flight causes significant pollution, the considerable total emissions from cars cannot be overlooked. For example, in large cities, traffic jams with congested vehicles release massive amounts of exhaust, which further aggravates air pollution. Additionally, the growing demand for car usage has placed huge pressure on finite resources such as oil. However, advancements in technology have enabled the automobile industry to achieve certain achievements in reducing emissions. The gradual popularization of electric vehicles makes limiting car usage more feasible and offers a more sustainable and flexible solution compared to banning flights outright.

　　In conclusion, while long-distance flights cause severe environmental harm, completely banning non-essential flights is not a wise move. We should comprehensively consider the environmental impacts of different modes of transportation and adopt more comprehensive and balanced measures.

　　写作词汇

【2024年雅思考试机经-点击免费领取】

【最新雅思口语题库-点击图片免费下载PDF版本】

【雅思免费试听课-0元领取】

【雅思全真模考-免费-点击进入】

【雅思水平测试-免费】

【2024年雅思考试机经-点击免费领取】

【最新雅思口语题库-点击图片免费下载PDF版本】

【雅思免费试听课-0元领取】

【雅思全真模考-免费-点击进入】

【雅思水平测试-免费】