雅思写作大作文高分范文：关于动物实验

2018-12-04 12:04:39来源：网络

【考试动态】2019年雅思考试时间表2018雅思考试时间雅思口语考试安排成绩查询雅思考前必看
【资料推荐】剑桥雅思1-10真题PDF下载雅思听力备考资料大全2019年1月雅思口语新题雅思作文批改
【备考指导】雅思报名新手指南2019年1月雅思口语新题范文雅思机考须知雅思考试评分标准

　　雅思写作考试重在多多积累素材以及练习，今天小编就给大家分享一下雅思写作大作文高分范文：关于动物实验，希望对大家有所帮助，更多雅思写作备考内容，欢迎随时关注新东方在线雅思网。

推荐阅读：雅思写作大作文高分范文汇总

　　题目：

　　Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.

　　Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　中文翻译：

　　现在动物实验被广泛用于开发新药物和测试其他产品的安全性。有些人认为这些实验应该被禁止，因为它在道德上是错误的，导致动物受苦，而其他人赞成他们，因为他们对人类的好处。

　　讨论这两种观点，并给出自己的意见。

　　范文：

　　It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.

　　On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.

　　On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a

　　necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.

　　In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.

　　(270 words, band 9)

查看全文