新东方在线网络课堂 雅思 新东方在线 > 雅思 > 雅思阅读 > 正文

2018年雅思阅读模拟题及答案解析(11)

2018-07-10 10:33:49 来源:网络雅思资料下载

  以下是新东方在线雅思网给大家分享的2018年雅思阅读模拟题及答案解析(11)。希望对大家的雅思备考有所帮助,更多雅思备考资料欢迎大家随时关注新东方在线雅思网。

热门课程】【2018年雅思阅读模拟题及答案解析汇总】【备考资料免费下载

  Selling Digital Music without Copy-protection Makes Sense

  A.

  It was uncharacteristically low-key for the industry’s greatest showman. But the essay published this week by Steve Jobs, the boss of Apple, on his firm’s website under the unassuming title “Thoughts on Music” has nonetheless provoked a vigorous debate about the future of digital music, which Apple dominates with its iPod music-player and iTunes music-store. At issue is “digital rights management” (DRM)—the technology guarding downloaded music against theft. Since there is no common standard for DRM, it also has the side-effect that songs purchased for one type of music-player may not work on another. Apple’s DRM system, called FairPlay, is the most widespread. So it came as a surprise when Mr. Jobs called for DRM for digital music to be abolished.

  B.

  This is a change of tack for Apple. It has come under fire from European regulators who claim that its refusal to license FairPlay to other firms has “locked in” customers. Since music from the iTunes store cannot be played on non-iPod music-players (at least not without a lot of fiddling), any iTunes buyer will be deterred from switching to a device made by a rival firm, such as Sony or Microsoft. When French lawmakers drafted a bill last year compelling Apple to open up FairPlay to rivals, the company warned of “state-sponsored piracy”. Only DRM, it implied, could keep the pirates at bay.

  C.

  This week Mr. Jobs gave another explanation for his former defence of DRM: the record companies made him do it. They would make their music available to the iTunes store only if Apple agreed to protect it using DRM. They can still withdraw their catalogues if the DRM system is compromised. Apple cannot license FairPlay to others, says Mr Jobs, because it would depend on them to produce security fixes promptly. All DRM does is restrict consumer choice and provide a barrier to entry, says Mr Jobs; without it there would be far more stores and players, and far more innovation. So, he suggests, why not do away with DRM and sell music unprotected? “This is clearly the best alternative for consumers,” he declares, “and Apple would embrace it in a heartbeat.”

  D.

  Why the sudden change of heart? Mr Jobs seems chiefly concerned with getting Europe’s regulators off his back. Rather than complaining to Apple about its use of DRM, he suggests, “those unhappy with the current situation should redirect their energies towards persuading the music companies to sell their music DRM-free.” Two and a half of the four big record companies, he helpfully points out, are European-owned. Mr Jobs also hopes to paint himself as a consumer champion. Apple resents accusations that it has become the Microsoft of digital music.

  E.

  Apple can afford to embrace open competition in music players and online stores. Consumers would gravitate to the best player and the best store, and at the moment that still means Apple’s. Mr Jobs is evidently unfazed by rivals to the iPod. Since only 3% of the music in a typical iTunes library is protected, most of it can already be used on other players today, he notes. (And even the protected tracks can be burned onto a CD and then re-ripped.) So Apple’s dominance evidently depends far more on branding and ease of use than DRM-related “lock in”.

  F.

  The music giants are trying DRM-free downloads. Lots of smaller labels already sell music that way. Having seen which way the wind is blowing, Mr Jobs now wants to be seen not as DRM’s defender, but as a consumer champion who helped in its downfall. Wouldn’t it lead to a surge in piracy? No, because most music is still sold unprotected on CDs, people wishing to steal music already can do so. Indeed, scrapping DRM would probably increase online-music sales by reducing confusion and incompatibility. With the leading online store, Apple would benefit most. Mr Jobs’s argument, in short, is transparently self-serving. It also happens to be right.

本文关键字: 雅思阅读模拟题

为你特别匹配的雅思超值课程,快速提分先人一步!
  • 【新东方名师直播】雅思公益课(第三季)

    适合人群:不知道如何高效备考,想要在短期考到7及7以上的考生。

    课时:5

    查看详情
  • 雅思机经高频词汇套装

    适合人群:为背单词枯燥而抓狂,又急需提高词汇量。

    课时:20

    查看详情
    -->
  • 考雅必备:10天练就纯正英音

    适合人群:想要纠正语音语调的考生

    课时:5

    查看详情
  • 【知心雅思】旗舰VIP直达 6.5 分班

    适合人群:想要冲刺6.5分的考生

    课时:344

    查看详情
  • 雅思核心1200词背诵

    适合人群:有背单词困难症的考生

    课时:44

    查看详情

课程试听换一换

  • 【新东方名师直播】雅思开学季公益课(...

    ¥1

  • 【知心雅思】旗舰VIP直达 7分班

    ¥5380

  • 【知心雅思】旗舰VIP直达 7分班(基础...

    ¥6379

  • 【知心雅思】旗舰VIP直达 6.5 分班

    ¥4880

  • 【知心雅思】旗舰VIP直达 6.5分 班(...

    ¥5879

  • 【知心雅思】全科提高冲 7分班

    ¥3280

  • 【知心雅思】 全科提高冲 6.5 分班

    ¥2880

  • 【知心雅思】旗舰VIP直达 6分班( 基...

    ¥5479

分享到:

相关推荐

交流 • 下载

精品课限量免费领

  • 【新东方名师直播】雅思IELTS公益课(第三季)
  • 雅思考试指南
  • 雅思写作考官范文
  • 英国大学排名
  • 【知心雅思】旗舰VIP直达7分班
  • 雅思口语全程备考攻略

热点资讯更多>>

实用 • 工具

雅思课程排行榜本周本月

雅思公开课更多>>

雅思7分阅读--LOH题详解 w 00分00秒
1 雅思7分阅读--LOH题详解
雅思6分阅读--搭配题怎样解? w 00分00秒
2 雅思6分阅读--搭配题怎样解?
雅思6.5分阅读--做题时如何规划时间 w 00分00秒
3 雅思6.5分阅读--做题时如何规划时间
雅思7分写作--大作文的展开方式 w 00分00秒
4 雅思7分写作--大作文的展开方式
雅思6分写作--如何开始学习写作? w 00分00秒
5 雅思6分写作--如何开始学习写作?

推荐阅读